Unit Price Comparison Analysis Study on Job Couple of Stone with Mortar


  • Asamalia Civil Engineering Department, Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa, Indonesia
  • Widarto Sutrisno Civil Engineering Department, Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa, Indonesia
  • Zainul Faizen Civil Engineering Department, Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa, Indonesia


unit price of work, comparison, SNI analysis, field analysis, materials, wages and equipment.


Procurement of building work cannot be done haphazardly, there are special standards that must be met by workers involved in implementing the project. In a project work to calculate construction costs, it is necessary to make a detailed analysis/calculation of the amount of materials used and the wages of workers. This calculation is usually known as construction cost analysis, which is needed as a means to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of development activities in the construction sector. The purpose of this study was to determine the percentage difference in the unit price of materials and wages for masonry and mortar work between the SNI analysis method, and the field, and to determine the dominant component that differentiates and equals in the preparation of unit price analysis. The research method uses quantitative analysis. Where the SNI analysis data is compared with field analysis data. The results of this study indicate that in the component of the tool there is a ratio of the largest percentage difference, which is 12.341% and in the ratio of the percentage of the smallest difference to the component of the material, which is -0.167%. In the description of the concrete mixer material, there is a large index difference ratio of 12.210% and the decomposition of rock material, there is a small index difference ratio of -0.1%. So that the percentage difference in the total unit price of materials, wages and tools is -0.143%. There is a difference in the description of the tool components between the SNI and field analysis methods. That is, there are additional descriptions such as other materials in the field analysis, while in the SNI analysis there is no description of other materials. And also there is a difference in overhead + provision where in the field analysis it is 10% while in the SNI analysis it is 15%.


Y. Juansyah, “Study on Comparative Analysis of the Building Cost Budget Using Method About SNI and BOW,” 2017.

R. Nur Hidayat, “Comparison of Budget Plans Between BOW and SNI Methods On Building Expansion Works.,” 2014.

D. Tiurmaida Siregar, “Analysis of the Budget Plan (RAB) at Home Simple Healthy (RSH) Type 42 Using Calculations Using the SNI Method Based on Hasar Price and Medan City Government Unit Price,” 2016.

F. Roechman, “Analysis of Work Unit Prices Using the BOW, SNI, and Methods Field.,” 2011.