Student Portfolios Rescoring in an Indonesian Private University Based on a Fuzzy MCDM

Authors

  • V. Reza Bayu Kurniawan Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa
  • Fransiska Hernina Puspitasari Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Keywords:

student portfolio, university, MCDM

Abstract

Due to today’s globalized era, there is a strong need to prepare skilled and competent future generations. This, of course, will involve the contribution from many parties including authorities and universities. In Indonesia, the ministry of education, culture, research, and technology has released a document to recognize student’s achievement as well as graduates’ competencies. This document will not only describe the academics history from the students, but also encourage Indonesian universities to take part in increasing young generations achievements through various academic programs. Although all universities have implemented the policy with different approaches, there has been a concern in scoring system once recognizing the activities achieved by students. In particular, the issue of unfair weight determined in the scoring system may be appeared. Therefore, this study addresses this issue by employing an MCDM approaches to improve the scoring system of student’s portfolio document. A case study in a private university situated in Indonesia is selected to apply the model. This study focuses on criteria within the most preferred category determined by the DMs in the university. The result indicated that there were 11 criteria screened based on the effort and impact variables. These criteria belong to high impact – low effort category. Then, these 11 criteria were weighted using the fuzzy AHP. The obtained weighted can be adopted by the DMs to improve more relevant and accountable student’s portfolio scoring system. However, a follow-up study should be carried out by taking into account the whole criteria in all categories

References

A. W. Finaka And R. Oktari, “Siapkah Kamu Jadi Generasi Emas 2045,” 2021. Https://Indonesiabaik.Id/Infografis/Siapkah-Kamu-Jadi-Generasi-Emas-2045 (Accessed Jun. 28, 2022).

P. Echo, “Sambut Dan Jadilah Pelaku Bonus Demografi Bersama Umko; Kenali Keuntungannya, Kalahkan Kelemahannya,” Mar. 18, 2022. Https://Www.Umko.Ac.Id/2022/03/18/Sambut-Dan-Jadilah-Pelaku-Bonus-Demografi-Bersama-Umko-Kenali-Keuntungannya-Kalahkan-Kelemahannya/ (Accessed Aug. 18, 2022).

Ijazah, Sertifikat Kompetensi, Sertifikat Profesi, Gelar, Dan Tata Cara Penulisan Gelar Di Perguruan Tinggi. Republik Indonesia: Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Tinggi, 2018.

T. Dan P. T. Direktorat Jendral Pembelajaran Dan Kemahasiswaan Kementerian Riset, “Surat Keterangan Pendamping Ijazah Dokumen 008,” 2015.

H. A. Rusdiana And Nasihudin, Panduan Kegiatan Kemahasiswaan Berbasis Skpi. Bandung: Uin Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, 2018.

Biro Akademik Dan Kemahasiswaan Universitas Lampung, “Panduan Surat Keterangan Pendamping Ijazah (Skpi).” 2020.

Bobot Komponen Surat Keterangan Pendamping Ijazah. Indonesia: Keputusan Rektor Universitas Tarumanegara.

O. Blasco-Blasco, M. Liern-García, A. López-García, And S. E. Parada-Rico, “An Academic Performance Indicator Using Flexible Multi-Criteria Methods,” Mathematics, Vol. 9, No. 19, Oct. 2021, Doi: 10.3390/Math9192396.

V. Epifanić, S. Urošević, A. Dobrosavljević, G. Kokeza, And N. Radivojević, “Multi-Criteria Ranking Of Organizational Factors Affecting The Learning Quality Outcomes In Elementary Education In Serbia,” Journal Of Business Economics And Management, Vol. 22, No. 1, Pp. 1–20, Jan. 2021, Doi: 10.3846/Jbem.2020.13675.

S. Liu, “Research On The Teaching Quality Evaluation Of Physical Education With Intuitionistic Fuzzy Topsis Method,” Journal Of Intelligent And Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 40, No. 5, Pp. 9227–9236, 2021, Doi: 10.3233/Jifs-201672.

Sutiah, Supriyono, I. A. Zuhriyah, And Z. Arifin, “Expert System On Core Competency Detection And Student Achievement Based On Fuzzy Topsis Method,” In Iop Conference Series: Materials Science And Engineering, May 2020, Vol. 846, No. 1. Doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/846/1/012026.

K. K. Mynit, “Multi Criteria Decision Making Methodology On Selection Of A Student For All Round Excellent Award,” Published In International Journal Of Trend In Scientific Research And Development, No. 5, Pp. 711–717, 2019, Doi: 10.31142/Ijtsrd26428.

F. Kong, “A Fuzzy Information Evaluation Model For Scientific Innovation Of Art Talents In Colleges,” International Journal Of Emerging Technologies In Learning, Vol. 15, No. 12, Pp. 217–229, 2020, Doi: 10.3991/Ijet.V15i12.14529.

N. Intan, S. Sulaiman, M. M. Sappri, And K. M. Ali, “Multi-Criteria Decision Making Techniques In Successful Knowledge Sharing Behaviour Among Malaysian Student,” 2012.

A. Castro-Lopez, A. Cervero, C. Galve-González, J. Puente, And A. B. Bernardo, “Evaluating Critical Success Factors In The Permanence In Higher Education Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making,” Higher Education Research And Development, Vol. 41, No. 3, Pp. 628–646, 2022, Doi: 10.1080/07294360.2021.1877631.

R. N. Hay’s, Z. Muttaqin, D. S. Maylawati, And M. A. Ramdhani, “Combining Decision Making Algorithms To Improve Accuracy Of The Course Assessment Rank,” Iop Conference Series: Materials Science And Engineering, Vol. 1098, No. 3, P. 032045, Mar. 2021, Doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/1098/3/032045.

Z. Li, Q. Zhang, X. Du, X. Qian, And B. Lev, “A Hesitant Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Method For College Applicants’ Learning Potential Evaluation,” Journal Of Data, Information And Management, Vol. 1, No. 1–2, Pp. 65–75, May 2019, Doi: 10.1007/S42488-019-00006-X.

A. Yunan And M. Ali, “Study And Implementation Of The Fuzzy Mamdani And Sugeno Methods In Decision Making On Selection Of Outstanding Students At The South Aceh Polytechnic,” Jurnal Inotera, Vol. 5, No. 2, Pp. 152–164, Nov. 2020, Doi: 10.31572/Inotera.Vol5.Iss2.2020.Id127.

R. P. Pratama, I. Werdiningsih, And I. Puspitasari, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Siswa Berprestasi Di Sekolah Menengah Pertama Dengan Metode Vikor Dan Topsis,” Journal Of Information Systems Engineering And Business Intelligence, Vol. 3, No. 2, Pp. 113–121, 2017, [Online]. Available: Http://E-Journal.Unair.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Jisebi

Y. C. Chou, H. Y. Yen, V. T. Dang, And C. C. Sun, “Assessing The Human Resource In Science And Technology For Asian Countries: Application Of Fuzzy Ahp And Fuzzy Topsis,” Symmetry, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2019, Doi: 10.3390/Sym11020251.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-19